Information |  Press Center |  Contact
Overview  -  Archive  -  Search Login  -  Register
Latest results
NGL ONE - 2008
SK 2
vs.
mTw.AMD 4
NGL ONE - 2008
SK 2
vs.
mTw.AMD 4
NGL ONE - 2008
MYM 3
vs.
mTw.AMD 4
Coming up next
No matches have been arranged.

12/08/07     Rematch of egp vs. wNv
The Match of wisdom Nerve victory and eGamespoint Thermaltake on matchday 7 will be replayed due to an invalid lineup of egp. The player BamNup was not allowed to play because he joined egp one day too late. The consequence is one penalty point for egp and a new scheduling regarding this match - both teams have to agree on a date until January, 6th. BamNup is not allowed to play in this match.

Comments
586

HowWeDo
wrote at Sat - Dec 08 2007, 23:48/11:48PM CET: #1
hahahahahahahha
3663

Tomken
wrote at Sat - Dec 08 2007, 23:49/11:49PM CET: #2
TARGA FIGHTING, FUCK ASIA! WHINErZZZZZ!!!! KEKEKKEEKEKKEEKEKEEKEKE
3520

cHrIzZi
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 00:30/12:30AM CET: #3
-.-
3174

CaLypSo)
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 00:36/12:36AM CET: #4
Bamnup joined eGp before the cw vs Defs, but he lost his NGL acc and said me that some days later, its unfair to replay a cw already played for 12 hours joining late unofficially because officially he is in eGp since 1 month
3174

CaLypSo)
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 00:41/12:41AM CET: #5
i have the way when a player cant play he is barred when i make lup, and here he was not, besides we played the cw in a bad schedule for us because wNv has only the time to play at this date and at this hour, and my players cancelled all they had to do to come at the cw because i accepted this schduele to be manner with wNv. Now the cw has been played its too late to react , give pps is enough and please get a system with barred players, because for 12 hours late i cant know if a player can play or not, then in rules its not saying if the player must join before the last cw or before the end of the playday.
3523

Sean C.
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 03:44/03:44AM CET: #6
#2 mind your mouth
3523

Sean C.
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 11:50/11:50AM CET: #7
wNv fight ! win is the best answer .
1451

losemann
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 13:19/01:19PM CET: #8
The player is not allowed to play the same matchday he is joining the clan.
(qoute from the rules)
@calypso
3490

Splitt
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 14:12/02:12PM CET: #9
gogo wNv gl lucifron
3517

eGp.Tt.Hamma
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 14:51/02:51PM CET: #10
And why the ngl admin didnt say anything about that and he has to see that Bamnup is barred so we can play with our other players but np wnv can give 2 deflooses and nothing happened just match gonna be replayed?
Caly tried to found matchday vs Wnv cause wnv has not much time so we played cause of our manner @16:00 friday which is very bad day for us.

So if its gonna be replayed eGp starts then with 2-0 cause wnv players were not here or it would be unfair cw or how you will handle that?

So i hope wnv is so fair that they will understand us cause Bamnup was allrdy in our team and its 12 hours not 1 day to late@Headadmin cause he lost his ngl acc like caly said.
2815

PovaL
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 14:57/02:57PM CET: #11
TT what can i say , gj job from wnv mangement .
30

Mars
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 15:10/03:10PM CET: #12
doesnt matter if it was 1 second, 12 hours or 12 days, he simply was not allowed to play.
the 2 pps against wnv for players being unavailable will still remain hopefully
3517

eGp.Tt.Hamma
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 15:14/03:14PM CET: #13
Doesnt matter that wnv lost fair a cw and def looses are invisible now?

n1n1 good for other teams who forced for that who thinks now to have more chances>-<
3517

eGp.Tt.Hamma
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 15:24/03:24PM CET: #14
So why wnv played vs Bamnup if he is barred and they didnt see that etc its like kind of they accepted to play vs Bamnup

Where in the rules that its forbidden that opponent clan can allow barred players:)?
Its nowhere yes and if a clan doesnt care about league its thier own faught if they lost
2728

Endarspire
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 15:30/03:30PM CET: #15
lol
3283

Inter.
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 16:32/04:32PM CET: #16
xDDD
2779

fastclick
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 16:52/04:52PM CET: #17
GAY
979

cr1stal
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 17:04/05:04PM CET: #18
#14

So if the bank doesnt tell you its not aloud to rob them you can just legally rob them?

no! Its just the responsibility of eGp to lineup the right players! Dont blame wNv anything!
27

Perdita
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 17:14/05:14PM CET: #19
Actually bamNup joined 36 hours too late - not like Calypso mentioned only "12 hours". There was no hint of anyone by wNv - the problem was found and discussed in the NGL-Staff and this is the only solution the rules should be used. wNv will still receive two penalty points for taking this clanwar not seroious enough.
3517

eGp.Tt.Hamma
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 18:17/06:17PM CET: #20
Matchday start @ Monday (26.11.07) 12:00 am(0:00) and Bamnup joined @thuesday (27.11.07) 12:42 pm so 6 hours+6hours 42 min----> 12 hours 42 min :)
not 36 hours as you mentioned
3517

eGp.Tt.Hamma
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 18:26/06:26PM CET: #21
i would understand it if bamnup joined 1 day or more to late and he would have won all 4 solos but he only won 2 sologames and the rest were def looses thats why its very funny that we have to play the hole cw to the end about 4 solos and def wins are now invisible for all.

And you can say ok first 2 games Bamnup was barred but not for the last 2 def wins cause wnv players were absent and just get some pps looks like that never happened.
2358

murdock
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 20:29/08:29PM CET: #22
Do I got it right that the match starts with 2:0 for eGp because wNv got two deflosses in the match?
That would be the only solution in my eyes, because the NGL said that the penalty points from the played match will stay alive.
103

reis
wrote at Sun - Dec 09 2007, 21:13/09:13PM CET: #23
seems like egp trying to blame their mistake to someone else! listen egp u did the mistake in the first place! bamnup wasnt allowed to play but u used him there is no need to talk about wnv behaviour cause that wasnt good at all. both teams got punished seems like you just complaining cause u know that ur chances to beat wnv with their full roster is pretty low.


@calypso cause u dont know the rules ngl one has to change their system so that u can see that a player can be used or not?
3185

vbadgirl
wrote at Sat - Dec 15 2007, 17:01/05:01PM CET: #24
a whole soap opera drama. In part yes It's my fault for not checking that the rules were respected but during that time my pc broke down and i couldn't -.-;;

Anyway, gl and cya on 20 Dec.
3221

hint
wrote at Sun - Dec 16 2007, 05:32/05:32AM CET: #25
xd..pretty anoying ..now there's no chance for eGp..i think.
1689

LucifroN7
wrote at Thu - Dec 20 2007, 22:18/10:18PM CET: #26
#25 ^^
4031

DeaDoRalive
wrote at Fri - Feb 01 2008, 01:30/01:30AM CET: #27
kor hacker omg ........ ;O



Add comment:
    You need to be logged-in to add a comment.
Main sponsors
Partners



Voting
What kind of broadcasting
do you prefer?


German Videostream
33 %
German Audiostream
7 %
English Audiostream
51 %
Korean Videostream
7 %
Korean Audiostream
0 %
© 2006-2009 by Freaks 4U GmbH